Skip to content

Crime and JusticeUnited States1 min read

Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii concealed-carry property rule in 6-3 ruling

The Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law requiring concealed-carry permit holders to get owner permission to enter private property.

Share

Topics

Group of judges in black robes seated and standing before red curtains, posing for a formal portrait in a courtroom setting.

WASHINGTON, June 25 (DC Times Online) — The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down Hawaii’s law requiring concealed-carry permit holders to get a property owner’s permission before entering certain privately owned places open to the public, ruling 6-3 that the measure violated the Second Amendment.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority in Wolford v. Lopez and said Hawaii’s law “violates the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.” He also wrote that it “hobble[s] what the Second Amendment protects: the right of Americans to carry arms for self-defense as they go about their daily lives.”

The decision voids Hawaii’s so-called “vampire rule,” which had required permission before lawful gun owners could bring firearms onto covered private property. The court’s majority was conservative, with three liberal justices dissenting.

The ruling adds to the court’s modern gun-rights cases, including District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008, which struck down Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban, and McDonald v. City of Chicago in 2010, which extended the Second Amendment right to state and local governments.

The court has now added another major limit on how far states can go in regulating where licensed gun owners may carry firearms.

Share

Topics

Sharon Green

Raised in Rohnert Park, California, Sharon Green is the Sonoma reporter for Times Media Service. Green covers local news in Sonoma, including city government and politics, the wine industry, schools, public safety, development and community life. Green holds a master's degree in mass communications.

Write to Sharon